Blogs ·  Liveblogs ·  Capture Kansas ·  Widgets ·  13 On Your Cell ·  Desktop Alert ·  In the Community ·  My Rewards
Home  ·   Local  ·   U.S. & World  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Political  ·   Money/Stocks  ·   Blogs  ·   Meet the Team  ·   Jobs  ·  
Mr. Food Recipes · KS Prep Zone · Shopping Plaza · Classifieds · Coupons · Programming · 13 On Your Cell
WIBW

$$$$$$$$
Blogs



Weather
Sports
Web Features
On-Air Programs
Capture Kansas
Send us your photos
13 On Your Cell
Wherever
you go
Desktop Alert
Up to the minute
WIBW Widgets
Put 'em anywhere
RSS Feeds
The latest headlines
Elk County Couple Has History of Animal Trouble Save Email Print
Posted: 10:47 PM Mar 21, 2008
Last Updated: 10:58 PM Mar 21, 2008

A | A | A

Two Elk county residents who are facing animal cruelty charges had nearly 60 animals removed from their property last week. Now, we're learning this isn't the first time they've been in hot water because of their critters.

Billy Claycamp and Susan Lyles each face 10 counts of cruelty to animals in Elk county. But we found out before this latest incident, officials in Butler county had numerous complaints about animals the two owned, including a lion that attacked a young girl.

"It has happened again. We had this going on in our county," says Butler County Sheriff Craig Murphy. "The exotic animals weren't the only animals she had."

It's a situation Butler county officials struggled with for years. A man and a woman with several animals in Leon... some considered exotic.

"We never had any abuse of animals in our County," explains Murphy. "It was, 'We've got a danger here and then we wind up with a couple of kids bitten."

Neighbors like Carrie Marlett saw everything from horses and pigs to lions and tigers. Exotic animals like large cats can be kept, but require a special permit, which the owners did not have. A female lion later attacked two children in 1994 and by law, was put down. But neighbors say eventually the owners just up and left.

"It was a big safety and property issue," says Marlett, who lived nearby.

Those owners were Billy Claycamp and Susan Lyles, who's last name was then Richards. They are the same two people who had the animals in Elk County taken from their property in Howard last week.

"It's not a problem unique to Elk County at all," says Marla Ware, Elk County Attorney.

The two face animal cruelty charges in Elk County. Officials in both counties say they don't believe Claycamp or Lyles necessarily had bad intentions, but possibly just couldn't keep up with the responsibility.

"They fail to recognize that they're not capable of being able to care for these animals," said Ware.

"I don't think it's a malicious act," said Murphy.

But intentions aside, authorities say they're now focused on trying to get help for the animals and the individuals involved. They say if they don't, they fear this won't be the last time this happens.

KAKE news made multiple attempts to contact Lyles and Claycamp but were unable to. They never faced charges in Butler county, but Claycamp's trial in Elk county begins March 31st. Lyles first appearance is April 1st.

More Stories
Bombs Explode At Wichita School

Debate Coach's Meltdown Caught on YouTube

Club Goes High-Tech To Keep An Eye Out For Trouble

Fight At North Wichita Club Injures 4

Double Amputee Soldier Returns Home

U Verse Hits Wichita

Rehydrate Your Fuel Tank

50th Anniversary of Dockum Sit-In

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Margaret Location: Wichita on Mar 24, 2008 at 10:25 AM
I would like to say that these individuals need to have all animals taken away from them. I am the young girl that was attacked in 1994. Charges were pressed and they owe me a very large sum of money. However, I will never see that money and they will continue to go around the laws to get more animals. It has been proven time and again that these animals are in the end only going to hurt more innocent children. These accidents will be with these children for the rest of there lives and these people do not feel any remorse for their actions and the danger they are putting people in.

Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 22, 2008 at 09:55 PM
I know someone from leon that had a lion, i', not sure if its the same lady or not but i do know that, she is not a bad person and doesn't need to be put in prison. I believe she just wants to try to help animals ( no matter how big or small ).

Posted by: Me Location: Wichita on Mar 21, 2008 at 11:15 PM
If it's not malicious then why did they not clean up, or at least cremate the dead animals that were just left laying in the fields? Yes, I do believe it was malicious. I believe these people need to go to prison for 1 year for each animal left alive, and up to 2 years for each animal that died while in their care. If we'd make an example out of them, some of this stuff would cease to exist.

Healthy Living