Blogs ·  Liveblogs ·  Capture Kansas ·  Widgets ·  13 On Your Cell ·  Desktop Alert ·  In the Community ·  My Rewards
Home  ·   Local  ·   U.S. & World  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Political  ·   Money/Stocks  ·   Blogs  ·   Meet the Team  ·   Jobs  ·  
Mr. Food Recipes · KS Prep Zone · Shopping Plaza · Classifieds · Coupons · Programming · 13 On Your Cell
WIBW

$$$$$$$$
Blogs



Weather
Sports
Web Features
On-Air Programs
Capture Kansas
Send us your photos
13 On Your Cell
Wherever
you go
Desktop Alert
Up to the minute
WIBW Widgets
Put 'em anywhere
RSS Feeds
The latest headlines
US Air Force Tanker Deal Awarded to Foreign Company Save Email Print
Posted: 3:43 PM Feb 29, 2008
Last Updated: 6:51 PM Mar 1, 2008
Email Address: news@kake.com

A | A | A

Kansas politicians are fuming over the US Air Force's decision to award a 40-billion dollar tanker refueler modification contract to a foregn company.

Boeing and French rival Airbus had been vying for the contract. Boeing said the deal would have meant hundreds of jobs in Wichita if it were awarded to them.

Boeing's Wichita facility would have served as a finishing location for the 767, in essence, outfitting it to become a KC-767, as well as test flying the planes before delivery to the military.

Kansas Congressman Todd Tiahrt told KAKE News previously that the contract would have meant nearly 4,000 jobs in the Wichita area for Boeing and its contractors. He also said the contract would have injected 14-million dollars into the local economy annually.

Meanwhile, the Airbus offer calls for the modification of its A-330 airplane into what would be called a KC-30 tanker. The A-330 is bigger in size to the 767 that Boeing would have used. However, it is less fuel efficient.

Statement from Kansas Senator Pat Roberts:

"I am extremely disappointed in the Air Force's decision to choose Northrup Gruman/EADS over Boeing to make the critical new aerial refueling tanker. From the beginning, the Air Force vowed to have an open competition process. I look forward to seeing their justification for this unfortunate outcome. Personally, I will scrutinize and insist on a Monday briefing by the Air Force to see the numbers that justify a contract for American planes going to a foreign entity, when the merits clearly reside with Boeing. If this decision holds, it will be at the cost of American jobs and American dollars, if not our national security."

Statement from Kansas Congressman and former Boeing employee Todd Tiahrt:

"I am deeply troubled by the Air Force's decision to award the KC-X tanker to a French company that has never built a tanker in its history. We should have an American tanker built by an American company with American workers. I can not believe we would create French jobs in place of Kansas jobs. I will work to ensure this decision is thoroughly reviewed at the highest levels of the Pentagon and Congress. At the end of this laborious process, I hope the Air Force reverses its decision."

Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius:

"We are incredibly disappointed and surprised Boeing was not selected to fulfill this important contract. Boeing's KC-767 Advanced Tanker provides a combination of military capabilities, job creation and economic benefits in more than 40 states, as well as financial and environmental advantages for taxpayers. Because it is more fuel efficient, selecting Boeing's model would have saved American taxpayers an estimated $10 billion in fuel costs."

Stay tuned to KAKE News and KAKE.com for the latest details in this developing story.

More Stories
Bombs Explode At Wichita School

Debate Coach's Meltdown Caught on YouTube

Club Goes High-Tech To Keep An Eye Out For Trouble

Fight At North Wichita Club Injures 4

Double Amputee Soldier Returns Home

U Verse Hits Wichita

Rehydrate Your Fuel Tank

50th Anniversary of Dockum Sit-In

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Reg Location: California on Mar 19, 2008 at 07:14 PM
Boeing corruption lost the contract years ago and now lost again because of corporate arrogance. Look on the bright side, this a is a well deserved slap in the face for Boeing to wake up and acknowledge a competitive global economy.

Posted by: William on Mar 11, 2008 at 10:35 PM
I thought the French were our friends. They helped the US in the war of 1776 and 1812. We helped liberate the Frence in World War II. Now they stab us in the back or rather the Air Force. Apparently the Air Force is not to bright.

Posted by: Jon Location: Spanaway, WA. on Mar 8, 2008 at 08:57 PM
Not only has the Bush Administration given the U.S. away to China to finance "Bushes" war in Iraq, now our "American Service Members" are going to be flying foriegn built aircraft. This is why the U.S. is in a "depression". This country's leaders are on the take and working for other governments, not for the United States. Any politicain that goes along with this farce of a contract should be tried by the American People for "Treason". As for the people that OK'd the deal with Air Bus, just line them up against the Pentagon wall and shoot the Treasonness Bastards. The American Service Members defending this country should be operating and utilizing "American Made" equipment, built for and by "Real Americans". As an "American" Tax Payer, retired "American" Service Member, I don't want my "American" Dollars going to a foreign country, to support "their" government and industries. The United States of America has been sold out. Now I know how Jesus felt after Judas sold Him out.

Posted by: Bob Location: Houston on Mar 7, 2008 at 08:59 PM
The fact remains that Airbus (SCAREBUS)is making the air platform and they will ultimately rake in the profits. MY tax dollars should not be spent with a foreign aircraft company when the best aircraft in the world,Boeing, is found right here in America. If Northrop Grumman wants the contract then they should purchase the aircraft platform they use from Boeing instead of the French owned and subsidized company Airbus. Airbus has NEVER flown a refueling tanker and Boeing has already engineered and delivered several. This contract MUST be overturned. It is bad enough that some of our "American" airline companies use SCAREBUS but our military should never, ever, be saddled with foreign made aircraft platforms, especially ones from France....Wake up America....

Posted by: Adam Location: Alabama on Mar 5, 2008 at 12:24 AM
In response to Mike...Several thousand jobs will be created. The numbers I've heard range from 3,200-4,000 here on the Gulf Coast. And to fix a misconception, the planes will be assembled in the US, not France. There is already an engineering facilty on site and the production facility is going to be built asap. Along with the AF tankers, commercial planes will be built here, as well. If this whole deal meant outsourcing of jobs to France, trust me the people and political leaders here would not want it. There is a VERY heavy military presence here with a major AF base an hour drive away both east and west, naval air station, naval shipyards, a major army base 90 min. north, etc. I'm rather suprised that people would make such a stink IF jobs were going to go to France, since Boeing has facilities in communist CHINA.

Posted by: Don Location: Topeka on Mar 4, 2008 at 10:16 PM
If you think that a plant will be built to build a France Plane you need to wake up and smell the roses. The only plant that will be built will be used to do the mods only. Once that is done then what does Alabama do with the building and all the lost jobs once France pulls out. The money goes overseas to a country that has never supported anything our great country does.

Posted by: cliff Location: wichita on Mar 3, 2008 at 12:26 PM
Nonunion, airbus is union. and has guarenteed for life jobs.

Posted by: Pete Location: Wichita on Mar 3, 2008 at 05:28 AM
I find it amazing that everyone is screaming about the flood of jobs going overseas due to this selection of a company other than Boeing. So, were all of you people asleep through the 90's when tons of jobs here in Wichita went overseas? You sleeping now? Aerospace engineering jobs here are more and more foreign. The high-end IT jobs are off shore. Huge portions of assembly work for these "build in U.S.A." planes you scream about are made in China, Italy, France, Germany, and so forth. Get a grip. You've already lost and it has nothing to do with a Tanker program bid.

Posted by: Mike Location: Wichita on Mar 2, 2008 at 09:04 PM
gerald, I guess your not paying attention. I saw where Boeing delivered the first 767 Tanker last week & will have another one leaving soon. I'm sure they could have delivered the first USAF plane more timely than Airbus. Adam in Alabama, how many job do you really think there will be down there. the platforms will still come from overseas. You'll end up putting the tail on the donkey & delivering it. Boeing will loss a complete airframe production line & probablly several thousand "jobsin America" over time. Wake up People.

Posted by: Daniel Location: Haysville on Mar 2, 2008 at 09:01 PM
Screw the US government.....if the Taliban attacks the US again I hope its Washington D.C. so that way they'll be killing 2 birds with one stone......the terrorist die and so do those corrupt greedy jerks in our government!! When my job is completely outsourced by next year I'm going to file for disability (I have a DR and Lawyer lined up). My government doesn't care if I have a job so they can pay me to sit on my duff at home!! Once again screw the US government!!

Posted by: jim on Mar 2, 2008 at 05:49 PM
our goverment wants us to do so good thats why they give away all of our work that would help americans an better there lives to some foriegn goverment sure glad its an election year

Posted by: Tom Location: WA state on Mar 2, 2008 at 05:32 PM
Why don't we outsource a few Air Force Generals to France (or better yet India) too. Boeing is a private company and Airbus (EADS) is a multigovenment (European) bureaucracy. EADS appears to be strikingly inefficient. Sen your thanks for this to John McCain.

Posted by: John Location: Denver on Mar 2, 2008 at 05:30 PM
Please help me to understand why our government would award a multi billion $ contract to a foreign company. The Sec. of A.F said he didn't consider job loss.

Posted by: jack Location: alaska on Mar 2, 2008 at 02:57 PM
The UNITED STATES Air Force trying to appease a politician has a awarded a MILITARY contract to a foreign company that has ties to china, dubar, north Korea, How and Why has this been allowed that a military plane that is made for War is being made by a foreign company. Politics aside A military plane should not be built by a Foreign company. An Investigation is needed

Posted by: jen Location: SC on Mar 2, 2008 at 11:34 AM
WTO needs re-thinking..Why do the Americans keep voting for those representitives who undermine the American People? Don't be lazy. Check out those you send to the White House and make sure they are Pro-People and Not just Pro-Corporate.. If we are to be duped out of Jobs and resources, the LEAST Washington could do is repeal the Fed. Income tax. Americans need their money in their own pockets, Washington is getting contract $$ and they shouldn't have BOTH. We could be Keeping our Payroll Taxes and start building our own business'. That would be FAIR in changing times such as these. We can't continue a 100 year notion with modern day ones..HELP!

Posted by: Donald Location: Marietta Georgia on Mar 2, 2008 at 10:50 AM
How sad that our own Air Force does not see the lack of wisdom in this unwise decision. Now what to do? Let's see how good a job public opinion can do! Certainly Presidentr Bush should inject his considerable weight to question just where our country and our Air Force should be giving its business too.

Posted by: gerald Location: wichita on Mar 2, 2008 at 09:22 AM
It is too bad that the decision to buy Airbus happened. But I think it was Boeings fault. The 767 is out of production and is smaller than rivals airplane. It could not haul as much fuel. Boeing sold off the Wichita plant because they did not want production headaches. If Boeing had presented a bigger model, then maybe it would have happened. But also Airbus has their model already assembled and waiting to be sold. It would take Boeing maybe 4 years or more to deliver the 1st tanker. I beleive Airbus will be much faster on delivery. I think Boeing did not plan this sale carefully. Maybe they do not want to mess with a handful of tankers, When they are selling so many commercial planes. I think the Union is the least of their worries. They did not really want the sale. Boeing needs to wake up and start up their assembly lines with new and better looking airplanes.

Posted by: david Location: augusta on Mar 2, 2008 at 07:08 AM
and they wonder why where in debt

Posted by: Jeff Location: Wichita on Mar 2, 2008 at 03:51 AM
How many jobs do we have to se go to other countries before the people of the united states stand up and say enough is enough!!!! You call for technicle help and you can't understand the person helping you because it's a foriegn country that has one of our jobs. When are our representitives going to stop this country from going into the hole? It's a shame that our military would even be allowed to consider a foriegn country to do work that should stay right here in the USA. When are the people going to stand up and say stop sending our jobs overseas. stop the bush administration!!!!!! Are we going to stand up or sit back until a foriegn country is in charge of us.

Posted by: kt Location: wichita on Mar 1, 2008 at 11:20 PM
KAKE you need to find out some names of the people who passed this. They need removed from there job. Dont let this story go away..The people would like to know..

Posted by: Kevin Location: Kansas on Mar 1, 2008 at 10:10 PM
I am very disappointed in our countries decision to award this contract to a foreign country. We hear every day how our economy is failing and we make a decision to send 4000 jobs out of this country. Do we not understand the impact this will have on us as a country. The ones who made this decision should be removed from their position because they do not have this countries best intrest in mind. But I guess this is no different then the manufactures today sending all of their business out of our country so we can improve our bottom line. We are not concerned about our country only our pockets. We have sold out this country to the one who will make our products the cheapest. America must wake up because America is not American owned any more. Isaiah 1:7 Your country is desolate your cities are burned with fire: your land, strangers devour it in your presence, and it is desolate, as overthrown by strangers. Do we not see what is happening or are we blinded by our wealth.

Posted by: j france Location: Wichia on Mar 1, 2008 at 09:48 PM
To whom it may concern, It is with heart-felt regret that I write this. As a former member of the USAF & USAFRes, I find myself in a state of disbelief. Disbelief, that beautiful United States of America (that I love so much and for which I was proud to serve) would award a government contract for the replacement of our great KC-135 Strata Tankers. Award a US contract, to a company represented by another country especially, a country that in times of need for the US they have not been willing to assist us. We have helped them to a far greater degree, than they have ever helped us. I am just having a hard time understanding why we would take away American jobs and give them to the French. We have given many American lives in the past to their security, why are we continuing this trend when there are American lives that in today’s economy need financial security? Nothing has so inspired me to write a message of this nature ever before. Bewildered, Former member of the USAF

Posted by: MPM on Mar 1, 2008 at 07:29 PM
Every congressman that voted to give airbus this contract should be held for treason....Again americans last....Makes me sick...

Posted by: Patriot Location: USA on Mar 1, 2008 at 06:44 PM
The unions are ruining the nation. Instead of empowering the workers, they take money from the employee and try to bully corporations so they end up exporting our jobs overseas. Wake up!! The usefulness of the unions went out in the 1970's

Posted by: AJ Location: Wichita on Mar 1, 2008 at 02:50 PM
NO wonder the euro is stronger than the US currency with deals like this I wonder who profit with this decsion. or will get backing for election. I hope the America people wake up soon. We are now supporting the whole world.

Posted by: Joe on Mar 1, 2008 at 02:12 PM
As far as Unions go...the non-union are just jealous that they do not make good wages and able to live on ONE job! They would rather be TOLD they have to work 12 hour days and 7 day work weeks... in able to make ends meet! Not me brother...slavery went out one hundred years ago! With that said,the Boeing deal is just another way our COMMUNIST government takes it upon themselves to do what they please...why is everyone so surprised?

Posted by: justin Location: derby on Mar 1, 2008 at 10:42 AM
Once again, our government looking out for someone else besides its own people. What kind of country is this when even the government sends its work to another country???

Posted by: Coz Location: Wichita on Mar 1, 2008 at 09:32 AM
This is to Dennis. Little do you know that the union has very little power in this state . The union has never stopped any company from sending labor out of this country.So don't protect your precious union so quickly. The union does nothing but suck money from a employees wallet. As for people with skills and knowledge the way this country is headed you will have to work overseas to use them.

Posted by: homeless Location: wichita on Mar 1, 2008 at 09:19 AM
We want the names of those who voted for Airbus. Their carreers are OVER!

Posted by: Dennis Location: Wichita on Mar 1, 2008 at 09:11 AM
Hey nonunion, even without this contract we union workers will still be making better wages than your unskilled non-union self. (you can't even put a proper sentence together). When and if we get laid off in the future we'll still have the skills and knowledge to get a good paying job somewhere else so we can continue to pay for you and yours to live in this country on our welfare system.

Posted by: nonunion Location: wichita on Mar 1, 2008 at 05:51 AM
why to go boeing union always want want want more more more now you dont get nothing na na na na na na na na hey hey hey good bye

Posted by: crinoid Location: Indiana on Mar 1, 2008 at 04:01 AM
My guess is that in the future (15 yrs?), Boeing/Spirit will find some weather resilient plateau in South America to build their airplanes. Skilled American labor will be a thing of the past, and most of what is left of those jobs will be found offshore somewhere. I fear that the only blue collar opportunities left in America will be garbage collection/superfund clean-up tasks-with no benefits. I sure hope the Reaganomics trickledown factor kicks in soon. Crinoid

Posted by: Adam Location: Alabama on Mar 1, 2008 at 12:06 AM
Let me first say that I can understand the great disappointment felt in Kansas regarding the decision. As a one time resident of eastern Kansas, I could see why that location would be just as wonderful as any! I find it rather intersting though that the way it's being reported there, it appears that this contract is leaving the US completely with no mention anywhere of Northrup Gruman. An AMERICAN company heavily involved in the winning bid. Don't be led on to believe that all these jobs are headed to France, etc. The planes are going to be built IN the US by AMERICAN workers on AMERICAN soil. A manufacturing plant will be built in this country. Creating the same amount, if not more jobs for Americans. Those are the facts. Us here were just as, if not more surprised at the outcome. The belief here was "It's Boeing, there's no chance." Maybe that was the problem. Boeing was arrogant in the process, and didn't fight nearly as hard as you deserved to win.

Posted by: phil Location: wichita on Feb 29, 2008 at 11:21 PM
what do you expect. Its the US gov. We know they are not to smart, now we relly know.

Posted by: mike Location: wichita on Feb 29, 2008 at 11:18 PM
what a joke, how could this even happen. Do you thind the french would be that dumb to send over a contract to the US like that. Just send some more that dollars out of the country. Only in the US. And people wonder way the US is slowing. Dumb decisions like this.

Posted by: PammySue Location: Texas on Feb 29, 2008 at 09:52 PM
This is outragous: a defense program for our own national security is now dependent on the French. We need to write our congressmen and anyone else that has influence regarding this decision. It should be appealed by Boeing and our senate and congress. You knew something was up with they would not announce the contract award on schedule. They were corssing the t's and dotting the i's - calling the politicians to cover their actions. American defense belongs in AMERICA. This is an insult to the working public in our Country. After all the subsidies and unfair practices by AirBus.

Posted by: Mike Location: Oxford on Feb 29, 2008 at 09:28 PM
I'm in total shock. I have worked for BOEING for 29 years. Being a VeitNam vet I can't beleive our Gov. would let this happen. I can not validate this but I think 85% to 90% of the dollars spent on the program will go to support AirBus & the country that would not support our country in the war in Iraq. I will protest the portion of my Federal Taxes from this day forward that support this decission. It's up to "US" (United States citizens) to stop this. Make you thoughts known!

Posted by: Dennis Location: Wichita on Feb 29, 2008 at 09:25 PM
Let us not forget that it was Republican front runner John McCain who initiated all of this mess. Is this who we really wnat running our country? Not Me!!!

Posted by: why am i american on Feb 29, 2008 at 09:19 PM
What! we have to pay for a 3 trillion dollar war but we aren't good enough to build military equipment. Isn't it about time that the people in the country who pay for the country run the country the american people are tired of being raped its time for a revolution.

Posted by: Barbara Location: Derby on Feb 29, 2008 at 08:47 PM
What a slap in the face. We pay in taxes and what do we get, planes for our government built in a foreign country,and we have people in the USA needing jobs, we need to start a protest that is heard from here to the Pentagon.I just wonder who got the real profit...it sure is not our workers.

Posted by: Angela Location: Wichita on Feb 29, 2008 at 07:32 PM
Buy American...how can we do that when the government is outsourcing? What kind of example is that setting. Shame on you people!

Posted by: Bob Location: Salina on Feb 29, 2008 at 07:21 PM
A government job being awarded overseas--makes one wonder--that's a load of crap and someone needs to do something--if our government and military is going to take it's jobs overseas what does that say for us as a nation--I think everyone in the USA needs to raise some H--- over this one and the decision needs to overruled and given to the company in this country.

Posted by: S. M. Location: Wichita on Feb 29, 2008 at 05:40 PM
Wasn't the purpose of the stimulus package to STIMULATE our economy?? So, how will this decision help stimulate the AMERICAN economy? It won't. This isn't a good decision, and frankly, it's getting tiring that our country sells us out every chance they get. RON PAUL 2008

Posted by: Shari Location: Rose Hill on Feb 29, 2008 at 05:09 PM
Why is our government so eager to help everyone except it's own citizens. That tanker should be built by AMERICANS!!!

Posted by: Kenny Dillon Location: Wichita, Kansas on Feb 29, 2008 at 05:03 PM
I Think our Department of Defense has some explaining to do. As the government sits here and says we are going into a recession our department of defense awards this project to another country. The French doesent even like America or Americans. I am extremely outraged over this and think that this should be investigated.

Posted by: Loretta Location: Park City on Feb 29, 2008 at 04:53 PM
You have GOT to be kidding! How in the world can the Air Force justify sending hundreds of jobs and thousands of dollars to France? We need that commerce to say right here on US soil. My husband, who is a boom operator and flys in the old tankers said he would rather fly in them then something that was made overseas. I sure hope this decision is re-thought.

Posted by: Tony Location: Wichita on Feb 29, 2008 at 04:51 PM
AAAHHHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHA..... Tanker Todd isnt doing a very good job now is he!

Posted by: Kansan Location: Kansas on Feb 29, 2008 at 04:40 PM
What did you expect, our government screws us over any chance it gets!

Posted by: Michael Location: Wichita on Feb 29, 2008 at 04:13 PM
Our government is out of control.

Healthy Living