CNN Fact Check: Jobless Benefits and Unemployment
Save Email Print
Bookmark and Share
Posted: 9:48 AM Mar 12, 2010
CNN Fact Check: Jobless Benefits and Unemployment
Does helping the jobless keep them out of work longer? CNN investigates the issue.
Reporter: By Matt Smith, CNN
Font Size:

(CNN) -- Does helping the jobless keep them out of work longer?

With the average unemployed worker out of a job for nearly 20 weeks and nearly 40 percent of the unemployed out of a job for more than six months, Congress passed a short-term extension of unemployment benefits and other economic aid last week. The vote came after the $10 billion bill was held up by Kentucky Republican Sen. Jim Bunning, who complained that the Democratic-led Congress should have found some way to pay for the measure rather than add the cost to the national debt.

Coming to Bunning's defense was Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona, a fellow Republican. Extending workers' unemployment checks "is a disincentive for them to seek new work," Kyl said on the Senate floor March 1. "I am sure most of them would like work and probably have tried to seek it, but you can't argue it is a job enhancer."

And former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, another Republican, said on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday that keeping benefits coming "keeps people from going and finding jobs."

"There's some studies that have been done that shows that people stay on unemployment compensation and they don't look for a job until two or three weeks before they know the benefits are going to run out," said DeLay, who resigned from Congress in 2006 and is awaiting trial on a money-laundering charge in his home state of Texas.

So, are people just kicking back, enjoying a couple of extra weeks of those unemployment checks? The CNN Fact Check desk decided to ask around.

Fact Check: Do unemployment benefits extend joblessness?

-- That's the consensus of most research, according to Bruce Meyer, a professor at the University of Chicago's Harris School of Public Policy. Meyer said that on average, extending unemployment benefits for five weeks means people are likely to spend an extra week on the jobless rolls.

-- A 2006 report by the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, found that workers who receive unemployment insurance checks, which average about $300 a week around the country, "have longer periods of unemployment than workers who do not receive benefits." And unemployment benefits may "somewhat discourage recipients from searching for work," the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found in 2008.

-- But Meyer cautions that there may be "many reasons" for that delay, and those reasons have not been as well researched. "A lot of people are waiting for a job that pays as well as the old one or close to it or is in a similar industry," he said.

-- For workers, there is "a real trade-off" between extending their job search and the often sharply reduced standard of living that unemployed workers face, Meyer said. "Jobs often aren't out there, and people have skills that have built up in a particular type of job and they don't quickly give up the use of those skills and move to something else."

-- The U.S. unemployment rate currently stands at 9.7 percent, with roughly 5.5 applicants for every available job, according to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics. But as the CBO points out, unemployed workers "quickly spend most of those benefits," making unemployment checks among the most effective tools the government has for stimulating the economy.

Bottom Line:

Academic research does support the argument that people take longer to find work when they receive unemployment benefits. But researchers have done little research into why that is, and some workers may have sound economic reasons for sitting out another week.

-- CNN's Emily Smith and Emma Lacey-Bordeaux contributed to this report.

Got something that needs checking? E-mail us at factcheck@cnn.com

The-CNN-Wire/Atlanta
TM & © 2010 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.


Latest Comments

Posted by: vickie Location: colorado on Mar 27, 2010 at 08:27 AM

I am 61 years old educated college lady that finds now I am considered to old to work and to young for social security. I have worked since I was 13 atleast two jobs, now I am lazy? Give me a brake! Wake up those that are asleep in Washington or get off the hill.
Posted by: Steve Location: Boston on Mar 15, 2010 at 06:45 PM

CNN HACK CHECK! When will you lazy reporters in the media get the story correct. All the current unemployment "extention" bills that have passed the Senate and House in the last few weeks have done is ENTEND THE ELIGIBILY PERIOD TO MOVE FROM ONE TIER of benefits TO ANOTHER. The bill DOES NOT extend the MAXIMUM NUMBER OF TOTAL WEEKS you can collect unemployment. It remains at a MAXIMUM of 99 WEEKS, PERIOD. Stop calling this and EXTENTION of weeks, that is simply a lie. This will help those who were previously not able to move to the next tier, because of deadlines to sign up for next tier like the one that ended on 28 Feb 2010. This just moves the sign up date further out, but once you get your 99 WEEKS YOUR ARE ALL DONE COLLECTING, and dropped from the official U3 statical unemployment numbers quoted monthly on the LAMESTREAM MEDIA such as CNN. 99 WEEKS, that almost 2 years of FUNemployment.
Posted by: JeanValjean Location: Seattle on Mar 13, 2010 at 05:21 PM

The House passed a bill extentind unemployment benefits for all people even those who are about to exhaust the last tier. We're not lazy, I apply hard. The recruiters tell me I'm competing with H-1Bs and other temporary work visa candidates, ALL THE TIME, in every position, and that I have no chance of getting the job. The US Congress is contemplating increasing the number of Temporary Work Visas! not decreasing them! I would be working within a month if they decreased the number of work visas. A lot of these temporary workers are out of work and I really wonder how they are able to bypass the system and stay here? Not to mention their spouse is allowed to work here as well on the same single visa. The Senate very shrewdly obfuscated the bill approved by the House and instead Finally approved the bill extending umemployment benefits for those who had already been approved for benefits, but were scheduled to have them expire; and, in the process silently ignored the House Bill.
loading...
iphone and ipad users