Blogs ·  Liveblogs ·  Capture Kansas ·  Widgets ·  13 On Your Cell ·  Desktop Alert ·  In the Community ·  My Rewards
Home  ·   Local  ·   U.S. & World  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Political  ·   Money/Stocks  ·   Blogs  ·   Meet the Team  ·   Jobs  ·  
Mr. Food Recipes · KS Prep Zone · Shopping Plaza · Classifieds · Coupons · Programming · 13 On Your Cell
WIBW

$$$$$$$$
Blogs



Weather
Web Features
On-Air Programs
Sports
Capture Kansas
Send us your photos
13 On Your Cell
Wherever
you go
Desktop Alert
Up to the minute
WIBW Widgets
Put 'em anywhere
RSS Feeds
The latest headlines
Sebelius Rejects Coal Plants, Stimulus Bill Save Email Print
Posted: 4:29 PM May 16, 2008
Last Updated: 10:27 AM May 17, 2008
1 comments Poll

A | A | A

Governor Sebelius signed four new bills into law Friday and let another pass without her signature, but most eyes were on one of the two she vetoed.

 
Should Gov. Sebelius have vetoed the Economic Stimulus bill to stop the Coal Plants?
No, the Economic Stimulus package was too important
Yes, the Coal Plant should not have been included with the Stimulus bill
She should have approved the plant from the beginning
The stimulus bill should have been rejected anyway
Don't know/ care
 

After twice rejecting lawmakers intentions to approve two new coal-powered plants for Sunflower Electric, state legislators included the measure in an economic stimulus package.

The maneuver was even questioned by proponents of the coal plants, according a statement released by the Governor, since it violated a section of the Kansas Constitution (Art. 2 Sect. 16) which prohibited two subjects in the same bill.

While Sebelius says she supports many of the provisions included in the bill, she chastised the legislature for not working toward a compromise solution, claiming they "recklessly chose to jeopardize important initiatives for businesses and communities across our state by combining them with energy legislation (she) ha(s) previously vetoed twice."

House Speaker Melvin Neufeld (R-Ingalls) criticized the Governor's move, claiming the veto will cost the state $16 billion. "While parts of our country are headed into a recession, our state's own economy is beginning to slow down, the Speaker said. "It is important we do whatever we can now to keep our state's economy going and growing" Read Speaker Neufeld's Response

Among the items set aside by the Governor's veto, according to Neufeld were a $100 million manuyfacturing plant in Johnson Co., another $100 million plant in Shawnee Co. and a $10 billion oil refinery in northeast Kansas.

"This was an opportunity to set Kansas on a strong economic course," the Speaker continued. "Leaving this work to future legislatures is a huge gamble for our state."

Sebelius does comment that she "remain(s) very supportive of many provisions contained within HB 2412 and hope to work with the Legislature, businesses and communities in the future to pass these important measures."

Supporters need two-thirds majorities in both houses to override a veto, but they have always been short in the House.

Additionally, the Governor rejected HB 2802, which she said would "put the regulatory process in the hands of a part-time legislature" and would increase the rates of all Kansans utility bill, while chiefly benefiting one company.

A proposal that allows people convicted of certain felonies was allowed to pass without the governor's signature because, despite her opposition, the nearly unanimous approval of the legislature seemingly ensured a veto would be overrridden

Laws regarding a sexual assault victim being allowed to request an examination, a change in the penalties for employees or volunteers aiding a prisoner escape, a change in the name of Fort Hays State's Endowment Assotiation, and authorization for KDOT equipment to be used for cleaning up flood debris were all signed.

More Stories
Topeka Police Officers--- To be

KDOR Cooks Out at the Capitol

Alaska Governor Moves to National Stage

Topeka Democrats React To Obama Nomination

Overnight Shooting in Topeka Injures One

Analysis: Palin's Age, Inexperience Rival Obama's

Charges Filed Against Mom of 11-year-old Killed in Car Accident

Child Run Over After Knocking Vehicle into Neutral

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: sherry Location: mayetta on May 17, 2008 at 06:45 AM
Once again I applaude the Govenor for standing her ground on the coal plants. I'm sure that Neufeld and his cronies will try to blame the Govenor for hurting the economy of Kansas, but they are the ones who tried to play politics and tie the two issues together. As far as I'm concerned Neufeld and his cronies are the ones who cost the State of Kansas $16 billion by trying to play political games. I would really like to know what behind the scenes perks Neufeld has been promised by Sunflower Electric. We need the wind power plants - we don't need or want the coal power plants. Please continue to stand your ground Govenor Sebelius.

Online Poll
Was Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin a good ghoice for Sen. John McCain

Yes
No
Don't know/ care