"What.... are they talking about?" That was my reaction when I read this statement quoted by the Associated Press on Wednesdsay.
"The Texas consortium’s chairman, John Kerr, said the Kansas site was improperly chosen because DHS ignored the high risk of tornadoes in the region, pointing to a tornado with 200 mph winds that struck the site last year. Damage to the facility could cause the release of deadly airborne pathogens, Kerr said.
“The selection of Manhattan, Kan., was grossly irresponsible, the equivalent of playing Russian roulette with Mother Nature,” he said."
Why should this concern you? Because these folks intend to file a suit in an attempt to take the recently awarded $450 million National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility away from Kansas. Part of the claim... is that Manhattan Kansas, is a bigger tornado danger than San Antonio Texas. It's an interesting claim. It's also quite false.
San Antonio, is in Bexar County Texas.
Manhattan is in Riley County Kansas.
According to the National Data Climate Center - US Department of Commerce... Bexar County has recorded 59 tornado touchdowns since 1950, and Riley County has recorded 22 confirmed touchdowns. Discussion over? Now, let's be completely fair to Bexar County... it is a larger county in area than Riley County. Bexar is almost 1250 square miles, and Riley County is about 625 square miles. That's about a 2 to 1 ratio. Here is the math.
Apples to Apples...
Bexar County(San Antonio) has recorded 59 confirmed tornadoes since 1950.
Riley County(Manhattan) has recorded 22 confirmed tornadoes since 1950.
To make "Apples to Apples"... the same size of apple...
Bexar County is 2.02 times larger than Riley County.
Sooooo.... 22 x 2.02 = 44.44(adjusted Riley County value to fairly represent tornadoes per square mile vs. Bexar)
And...
Bexar 59 / Adjusted Riley County 44.44 = 1.32
Or... simply stated, Bexar County has recorded a 32% higher tornado frequency, per square mile over the past 59 years verses Riley County Kansas.
It seems unfair to claim that “The selection of Manhattan, Kan., was grossly irresponsible, the equivalent of playing Russian roulette with Mother Nature". Frankly, it appears that San Antonio, may have been a more dangerous choice in relation to tornadoes.
The data follows. You may also view this data by visiting:
http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~storms
Texas